Anmar Faleh Alhogbani vs Sarthak Suden Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Aug at 06:47 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Faleh Alhogbani vs S. Suden

KSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Alhogbani 1 - 0 Suden
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anmar Faleh Alhogbani winning 2 and Sarthak Suden winning 0. The last match between Anmar Faleh Alhogbani and Sarthak Suden was at the M15 Singapore, 03-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Anmar Faleh Alhogbani getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alhogbani | 1 |
| Suden | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M15 Singapore(08-03-25)
A. F. Alhogbani vs S. Suden H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.33% (72-63) | Career Total W/L | 27.78% (10-26) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. F. Alhogbani vs S. Suden Match Preview:
- Alhogbani tends to struggle with their second serve, winning 41.62% of points on it, whereas Suden performs better with a 48.08% success rate. How crucial is this stat in determining match outcomes? A significant one, it often correlates with match prediction accuracy.
- In terms of returning opponents' second serves, Alhogbani outperforms Suden, securing 53.85% of points compared to Suden's 42.11%. This stronger return game could be a deciding factor in this encounter.
- When it comes to handling breakpoints, Suden has the edge, saving 57.14% against Alhogbani's 52.17%, a valuable insight for betting strategies during pressure moments.
- Over the past year, Alhogbani has been more successful in matches, winning 48.48%, compared to Suden's 40% win rate.
- Both players have their best win percentages on hard courts; Alhogbani at 52% and Suden significantly lower at 30%.
- Considering the general level of opponents faced, Alhogbani's faced opponents with an average rank of 216.03, while Suden faced slightly tougher opponents averaging a rank of 112.27.
- In matches that went to a deciding set, Suden has proven to be more resilient, winning 67% of those sets compared to Alhogbani's 20%.
- For breakpoint conversions, Alhogbani is more efficient, converting 44.44% of opportunities, whereas Suden converts only 27.27% of theirs.
Editorial Prediction (August 3, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the key statistics and performance metrics, Alhogbani displays an impressive ability to convert breakpoints and return second serves, both critical areas where they outperform Suden.
Despite Suden's strength in saving breakpoints and their higher winning percentage in deciding sets, their overall win rate and efficiency on hard courts lag behind Alhogbani.
Given these patterns, Alhogbani's more robust return game and breakpoint conversion prowess are likely to give them the edge in this match.
Therefore, the prediction leans towards Alhogbani as the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani vs Sarthak Suden Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. F. Alhogbani vs S. Suden H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1:13:42 | Average Match Time | 1:13:42 |
| 52% (26/50) | 1st Serve % | 70% (40/57) |
| 88% (23/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (19/40) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (29/57) | Return Points Win % | 30% (15/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. F. Alhogbani Recent Matches Played
S. Suden Recent Matches Played

A. F. Alhogbani vs S. Suden Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.33% (72/63) | YTD Win/Loss | 27.78% (10/26) |
| 53.08% (155/137) | Sets Win/Loss | 31.25% (25/55) |
| 53.11% (1399/1235) | Games Win/Loss | 42.50% (337/456) |
| 55.66% (59/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 30.30% (10/23) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 286 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 171 | Total Double Faults | 31 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 260.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 141.94 |
| 62% (3007/4887) | 1st Serve % | 59% (346/590) |
| 68% (2033/3007) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (198/346) |
| 46% (862/1880) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (100/244) |
| 42% (203/481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (14/43) |
| 40% (1880/4700) | Return Points Win % | 34% (203/602) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.20% (71/60) | Futures W/L | 27.78% (10/26) |
| 52% (68/130) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 26% (9/35) |
| 42% (11/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 43% (12/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 86% (76/65) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 64% (11/7) |
| 13% (76/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 36% (11/4) |
| 9% (58/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (25/3) |